 |
|
|
February 24, 2010 -
The Goodman Law firm obtains $1,389,000.00 trial decision for clients.
Press Release
November 11 2009
A San Diego County Superior Court Judge tentatively awarded $1,089,000.00 in compensatory damages to Operation Education, Inc. and $300,000.00 in punitive damages in its lawsuit against the Tactical Learning, LLC. a.k.a. Smart Industries, LLC in case no. 37-2007-00083585-CU-BC-CTL, after a 4 day contested bench trial. The Court in its tentative decision found willful misappropriation and conversion by Tactical aka Smart Industries of the intellectual property of Operation Education, Inc., a business selling College Level Examination Programs to military personnel. Operation Education, Inc. sued in 2008 for alleged violations by Tactical Learning, LLC a.k.a. Smart Industries LLC of the California Uniform Trade Secrets act by knowingly misappropriated trade secrets from Operation Education, Inc. through former consultants of Operation Education, Inc... The former employees of Operation education subsequently became principles of the start-up Cross-defendant Tactical Learning, LLC aka Smart Industries, LLC.
Operation Education, Inc. was represented by John M. Goodman of The Goodman Law firm. It specializes in commercial litigation.
Inquiries regarding this release should be directed to Mr. John Goodman at john@jmgattorney.com.
February 24, 2010 -
The Goodman Law firm teams with Johnson Law firm to handle Avandia Litigation
The Goodman Law firm has entered into a strategic joint venture for the handling of Avandia product liability litigation in Los Angeles Superior Court. The cases are presently at issue as to parties and subject to coordination proceedings.
February 24, 2010 -
Trade secrets law
A new important case for pleading Trade Secret violations cases in California came out. KC Multimedia v Bank of America held that the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act preempts many common law tort causes when they involve the same nucleus of fact. So beware when pleading that your common law claims involve some arguable difference or they will be preempted and subject to demurrer or summary adjudication. Defense counsel would do well to ferret out boilerplate pleading which incorporates by reference identical claims and fact and have them stricken under KC Multimedia reasoning.
April 05, 2010 -
Goodman Law firm wins trial for Assignee defeats Fair Debt Cross-complaint
Case 37-2009 -00074490 Tried March 16 2010 department S-4 the Goodman Law firm successfully prosecuted it's claim for money damages and defended claims of misrepresentation under 15 USC 1692, the Rosenthal Act and as against ancillary standing issues related to mesne assignments of the debt to plaintiff Cavalry Portfolio. This was a short cause contested bench trial.
April 19, 2010 -
Goodman Law Firm win trial
Case 372000992306 contested trial judgment for plaintiff Chase Bank NA
April 19, 2010 -
Goodman Law Firm wins trial
Case37-2009-00091413 Judgment in full for plaintiff Citibank contested trial.
May 15, 2010 -
Zimmer Duram Hip Cup Products Litigation
Goodman Lawfirm retained to prosecute claims pursuant to 28 USC Section 1407 for and interested party before the panel of Multidistrict Litigation in Washington DC regarding allegation of defective medical device.
August 12, 2010 -
Goodman wins trial
Chase Bank USA NA This was a short cause contested bench trial. Defense claim securitization of debt and public trading as part of a bundled asset constituted hypothecation of title thus raised a standing issue. Court excluded evidence on plaintiff motion. Costs to plaintiff.
Case 37-200900095915
|
|
|
|
|
